It's what keeps us locked in "either/or" thinking: the notion that we can have only big government or no government the assumption that we must either tolerate forty-six million without health insurance or embrace "socialized medicine". For it's precisely the pursuit of ideological purity, the rigid orthodoxy and the sheer predictability of our current political debate, that keeps us from finding new ways to meet the challenges we face as a country. Whenever we dumb down the political debate, we lose. I am convinced that whenever we exaggerate or demonize, oversimplify or overstate our case, we lose. Ultimately, though, I believe any attempt by Democrats to pursue a more sharply partisan and ideological strategy misapprehends the moment we're in. If the Democrats ever want to get back into power, then they will have to take up the same approach. The accepted wisdom that drives many advocacy groups and Democratic activists these days goes like this: The Republican Party has been able to consistently win elections not by expanding its base but by vilifying Democrats, driving wedges into the electorate, energizing its right wing, and disciplining those who stray from the party line. We lost the courts and wait for a White House scandal.Īnd increasingly we feel the need to match the Republican right in stridency and hardball tactics. We lose elections and hope for the courts to foil Republican plans. In reaction to religious overreach, we equate tolerance with secularism, and forfeit the moral language that would help infuse our policies with a larger meaning.
In reaction to those who proclaim the market can cure all ills, we resist efforts to use market principles to tackle pressing problems. In reaction to a war that is ill conceived, we appear suspicious of all military action. “Mainly, though, the Democratic Party has become the party of reaction. The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream They are out there, waiting for Republicans and Democrats to catch up with them.” They don't always understand the arguments between right and left, conservative and liberal, but they recognize the difference between dogma and common sense, responsibility and irresponsibility, between those things that last and those that are fleeting. I imagine they are waiting for a politics with the maturity to balance idealism and realism, to distinguish between what can and cannot be compromised, to admit the possibility that the other side might sometimes have a point.
They are out there, I think to myself, those ordinary citizens who have grown up in the midst of all the political and cultural battles, but who have found a way-in their own lives, at least- to make peace with their neighbors, and themselves. Or maybe the trivialization of politics has reached a point of no return, so that most people see it as just one more diversion, a sport, with politicians our paunch-bellied gladiators and those who bother to pay attention just fans on the sidelines: We paint our faces red or blue and cheer our side and boo their side, and if it takes a late hit or cheap shot to beat the other team, so be it, for winning is all that matters.īut I don't think so. Maybe there's no escaping our great political divide, an endless clash of armies, and any attempts to alter the rules of engagement are futile.